Reviewed · how we check firm rules
Propfirm passing service
Propfirm passing service — pass your challenge for a flat $220
You picked the firm. You paid the fee. What you need next is a funded account — not another failed attempt. We trade the evaluation for you, respect every rule, and hand over the login when it is funded.
Still find it hard to trust us? Start with a free demo. You do not have to risk the $220 evaluation to find out how we trade. Open a demo account with any broker you already use, send us the login, and we trade it for seven days under a written plan while you watch the results in real time. No card, no deposit, no obligation — if the week does not convince you, you simply walk away and pay nothing.
Firms we pass
- FTMO
- FundedNext
- Apex
- Topstep
- The5ers
- MyFundedFutures
- FXIFY
- Alpha Capital
Most firms listed prohibit third-party trading in their terms, and a funded account can be voided if that clause is enforced. We tell you in writing what your firm's clause says before you pay; the enforcement risk stays with the account holder. Read the terms.
What ElitePropX is
A challenge-passing service built around the rules, not around luck
Most traders do not fail a prop firm evaluation because they cannot read a chart. They fail because a $100,000 account with a 5% daily loss limit and a trailing floor is an unforgiving machine: two bad hours on a news candle, one oversized position, one attempt to win back yesterday's loss, and the account is gone before the strategy ever had a chance to work.
ElitePropX exists for the gap between "I can trade" and "I can pass this specific set of constraints in this specific window." We take the evaluation off your hands, trade it against the firm's published rules, and deliver a funded account. You keep the account, the payouts and the track record. We charge a flat fee and move on.
What we actually do
- Read your chosen firm's rulebook in full — daily loss, maximum loss, trailing versus static, consistency, minimum days, news and weekend restrictions.
- Build a sizing plan that keeps the account alive through normal losing streaks.
- Trade the evaluation across sessions until the profit target is verified.
- Hand over the funded credentials, then step back. The account is yours.
What we do not do
- We are not a signal group, a fund, a course or an affiliate funnel.
- We do not take a cut of your payouts. There is no profit split, ever.
- We do not promise "guaranteed" funding — firms can and do change terms.
- We do not hide the risk: breaching a firm's terms can void an account, whoever trades it.
How it works
Four steps from evaluation to funded login
The process is deliberately boring. You choose the firm and the account size, we handle the execution, and the handover happens the moment the firm confirms the pass.
1. Choose the firm and account size
Tell us which evaluation you want passed — FTMO, FundedNext, Apex, Topstep, The5ers, FXIFY, MyFundedFutures, Take Profit Trader, Alpha Capital Group or any of the other firms we cover. Account size does not change the price. A $25k evaluation and a $300k evaluation both cost $220, because the work is the same: respect the rules until the target is met.
If you have not decided yet, our 2026 prop firm comparison breaks down drawdown models, payout terms and evaluation structures side by side, and the rules matrix puts the exact numbers in one table.
2. Pay the flat fee
One payment, no subscription, no upsell to a "premium" tier halfway through, no percentage of future profits. The evaluation fee you pay the firm is separate and stays with the firm — that is true of every passing service and every trader who attempts a challenge alone.
3. We trade the evaluation
Your evaluation is traded against a written plan derived from that firm's rulebook. The plan defines the maximum risk per trade, the daily loss budget, how much of the profit target to take per session, and when to stop for the day. Progress is reported as it happens, not in a single message after two weeks of silence.
4. You receive the funded account
When the firm verifies the pass, the funded credentials are handed to you. From that point the account is under your control: you trade it, you request payouts, you keep 100% of the profit. We stay available for rule questions, but we do not trade the funded account and we do not take a share.
Pricing
One price, every account size
Passing services that charge a percentage of the account or a share of the payout create a strange incentive: the more you earn, the more you owe. We removed that. The fee is $220 whether the evaluation is $25,000 or $300,000, and the funded account belongs to you outright.
| Account size | ElitePropX fee | ElitePropX share of payouts | Retries |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25,000 | $220 | 0% — the firm's own split still applies | Covered |
| $50,000 | $220 | 0% — the firm's own split still applies | Covered |
| $100,000 | $220 | 0% — the firm's own split still applies | Covered |
| $200,000 | $220 | 0% — the firm's own split still applies | Covered |
| $300,000 | $220 | 0% — the firm's own split still applies | Covered |
The evaluation fee is not included. Firms charge their own challenge fee, and that money goes to them, not to us. What you are buying from ElitePropX is the execution and the rule discipline that gets the evaluation passed. The flat-fee plan page sets out what is delivered, what is excluded, and how retries are covered.
Why the flat fee matters more than it sounds
Consider the arithmetic of doing it yourself. A mid-size futures evaluation costs a few hundred dollars per attempt. Traders who fail once usually try again — sometimes three or four times. By the third attempt the sunk cost is larger than the account profit they were chasing, and the pressure to "win it back" produces exactly the behaviour that fails evaluations: oversized positions, trades outside the plan, holding through a news release that the firm restricts.
A flat fee changes the economics. You are not paying per attempt, so a second attempt costs you nothing extra in service fees. And because there is no profit split, the upside of the funded account is not diluted. The only party with an incentive to see you trade recklessly is nobody.
Why evaluations fail
The four rules that end most challenges
Across hundreds of managed evaluations, failures cluster around a small number of mechanical errors rather than bad market reads. Understanding them is useful even if you never hire a passing service, because they explain why a strategy that works on a demo account produces a blown evaluation.
Daily loss limit
The tightest constraint on most accounts. A single oversized position can consume the entire daily budget, and the day is over regardless of what the market does next.
Trailing drawdown
A floor that follows your equity upward shrinks your cushion every time you are right. Traders who bank a big early win often fail because the floor moved with it.
Consistency rules
Firms increasingly refuse payouts when one day dominates total profit. A 40% best day can disqualify an otherwise legitimate pass.
Behaviour
Revenge trading after a loss, doubling size to recover, and abandoning the plan at the first drawdown. This is the rule that is not in the rulebook, and it causes the most damage.
Read the full breakdown in our guide to the consistency rule, which includes the arithmetic firms use and how to keep any single day under the threshold.
The arithmetic
Target and drawdown are one equation
A prop firm evaluation is a probability problem dressed as a trading opportunity. The target tells you how far you must travel. The drawdown tells you how much room you have to be wrong along the way. Most traders size for the target — they calculate the position that reaches 10% fastest — and then discover that the same position can lose the account in three bad trades.
Our sizing model starts from the loss limit and works backwards. If a $100,000 account has a 5% daily limit, the daily budget is $5,000 and no single trade is allowed to risk more than a third of it. Three consecutive losses — a routine occurrence for any strategy with a normal win rate — leave the account bruised but alive. The target is then reached by repetition, not by one heroic trade.
This is the least exciting part of the service and the reason it works. There is no secret indicator. There is a defined risk per trade, a defined number of attempts per day, and a hard stop when the daily budget is spent.
Inside the process
What a managed evaluation actually looks like, day by day
Every evaluation follows the same rhythm, though the length changes with the firm. A two-phase forex challenge with no time limit is paced very differently from a futures evaluation with a thirty-day window, and the daily plan is written accordingly.
Day one: mapping the rulebook
Before a single trade is placed, the firm's rules are written into a one-page plan: the profit target in currency and percentage, the daily loss limit in currency, whether the maximum loss is static or trailing, whether the trailing stops at break-even or keeps following, the minimum number of trading days, any consistency requirement, and the restrictions on news trading, weekend holds, and instruments. This document is the only thing that decides whether the evaluation is passed. Market opinion is secondary.
Days two to four: building the cushion
The opening phase is deliberately unremarkable. Positions are sized so that a losing streak of three or four trades cannot approach the daily limit, and the target exposure is chosen from the firm's permitted instrument list rather than from a favourite pair or contract. The goal of the first days is not profit — it is distance between equity and the failure floor. A trader who is 1% up with the floor untouched has more room to work with than a trader who is 3% up with a trailing floor sitting just beneath the current price.
The middle: pacing, not sprinting
This is where most self-managed attempts die. Once an account is halfway to target, the temptation is to accelerate, which means larger size, which means the daily limit is consumed by a single position. In a managed evaluation the daily risk budget is fixed at the start and does not expand because the account is winning. Progress is reported as it happens, and if a day is flat, that is recorded as a flat day rather than an excuse to double up.
The final stretch: protecting the pass
When the target is within reach, the priority flips from making money to not breaching anything. Trading stops earlier in the session, size comes down, and the remaining ground is covered in small increments. Where a firm requires a minimum number of trading days, those days are logged with legitimate activity — a requirement that catches out traders who sprint to target in three sessions and then discover the account is not eligible for funding until day ten. The final checkpoint is the consistency test: if one day is more than roughly a third of total profit, additional ordinary winning days are added until the distribution is acceptable.
When the firm verifies the pass, the account is funded and the credentials are handed over. From that moment the plan is yours to keep or throw away — and the funded phase has its own set of checkpoints before a payout clears.
Firms
Firms we pass, and how they differ
We support more than twenty proprietary trading firms across forex, CFDs and futures. They are not interchangeable: a firm with a static drawdown and no time limit is a very different assignment from a futures firm with a trailing intraday floor and a 30% consistency rule.
Forex and CFD firms
FTMO, FundedNext, The5ers, FXIFY, Alpha Capital Group, FundingPips and similar. Generally two-phase or single-phase, percentage-based targets, and a mix of static and trailing drawdowns. Payout cycles are usually monthly or bi-weekly.
Futures firms
Apex Trader Funding, Topstep, MyFundedFutures, Take Profit Trader, TradeDay and others. Dollar-based targets, intraday trailing thresholds, consistency rules at payout, and a strong emphasis on minimum trading days.
Instant funding
Accounts that skip the evaluation and start funded, at a higher purchase price and with tighter early withdrawal rules. Often the better choice for traders who want exposure without a two-phase clock.
Not sure which firm to choose? Read the full 2026 comparison or the rules matrix for exact targets, daily limits and drawdown types.
Evidence
Certificates, not screenshots of a demo account
Any service can post a green equity curve. What matters is whether the firm itself confirmed the pass. Our passed challenges page collects certificates issued by the firms after evaluations we traded were verified — including FX2 Funding, The5ers and Alpha Capital Group — alongside the account size and the time taken.
We also publish client reviews from traders who used the service, including the ones that describe what went wrong on a first attempt. A page of five-star screenshots proves nothing; a page that includes a failed attempt and what happened next tells you how the service actually behaves when the market does not cooperate.
Compliance, firm terms and fair use
Passing services sit in an area that prop firms treat inconsistently, and the honest version of that story is worth reading before you pay anyone — including us.
- Some firms prohibit third-party trading outright. Their terms may state that the account must be traded by the account holder personally, and that any other arrangement voids the evaluation or the funded account. If a firm takes that position, using a passing service carries the risk of losing the account after funding, not just during the evaluation.
- Other firms restrict account sharing but do not police who presses the button. Enforcement is usually reactive: it happens when something else draws attention to an account, such as an unusual payout request or a pattern that breaks the consistency rule.
- Firms change terms frequently. A policy that permitted third-party trading last quarter may be gone this quarter. Nobody, including us, can give you a permanent guarantee about a firm's future enforcement.
- You are the account holder. KYC is matched to you, payouts are paid to you, and any dispute with the firm is yours to resolve. Our role ends when the funded login is handed over.
The practical advice is unglamorous: read your firm's terms, ask us what we know about that specific firm's current policy, and decide with your eyes open. If a firm's rules make a passing service a bad idea for you, we would rather tell you before you pay than after your payout is frozen. The longer version of that checklist is in whether a propfirm passing service is legit, which keeps the legal question separate from the firm-permission question and from the delivery question.
Honest limitation: a passed evaluation is not a guarantee of future payouts. Firms can change rules, tighten consistency requirements, or reject a payout for reasons unrelated to how the account was traded. Read your firm's terms before you buy any service, including ours.
After the pass
What happens once the account is funded
The moment of funding is not the finish line. Most firms relax the evaluation rules on a funded account but add new ones: a minimum number of trading days before the first payout, a profit threshold, a consistency check, and identity verification.
- Funded credentials issued. The account is in your name and under your control.
- Minimum trading days. Usually five to ten, depending on the firm.
- Profit target for payout. Often 5–10% on forex accounts, or a dollar figure on futures accounts.
- Consistency check. No single day should dominate your total profit.
- KYC. Identity and address documents, matched to the account holder.
- Withdrawal. Typically one to seven business days after approval.
If you want the detail, our guide to the funded account payout process walks through each step and the mistakes that delay a withdrawal.
Compare your options
Three ways to get funded — and what each really costs
| Option | Typical cost | Time | Main risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trade the evaluation yourself | Firm fee per attempt, often repeated | Weeks to months | Repeated failures, sunk cost, emotional sizing |
| Buy signals or a course | Monthly subscription or one-off fee | Indefinite | No accountability for the evaluation result |
| Use ElitePropX | $220 flat, once | Around 14 days on average | Firm rule changes; terms-compliance must be checked |
A signal group sells information. A course sells education. Neither takes responsibility for the only outcome that matters: whether the evaluation is passed and the account is funded. Our fee is tied to that outcome, and the funded account has no strings attached to us.
Before you start
What to prepare so the handover is smooth
The technical part of a managed evaluation is ours. Three small things on your side make the difference between a pass that converts into funding on day one and one that stalls in the firm's verification queue.
1. Know which firm and which account size
Firm names are not enough, because most firms run several evaluation models. FTMO runs a two-phase challenge with a 10% target and no consistency rule on that route; Apex runs dollar-based EOD or intraday models with a 50% consistency rule at payout. If you are choosing between two firms, ask which one passes more reliably at your preferred account size — the answer is usually the one with a static drawdown and no consistency rule, because there is less that can technically disqualify a finished attempt.
2. Have your KYC ready before the funded phase
Identity verification is a firm requirement, not ours, but it is the most common reason a funded trader waits an extra week for a first payout. Government ID, a matching address document, and a payment method in the same name remove almost all verification delays.
3. Decide how you will trade the funded account
This is the part we cannot do for you. A funded account has its own daily limits and its own consistency expectations, and traders who pass an evaluation and then trade it like a personal account usually give it back within a month. If you have a written plan for the funded phase — maximum risk per trade, maximum daily risk, target, and a rule for stopping — you are in a much stronger position than someone who simply wants to be funded.
When those three things are in place, the process is short: confirm the firm and size, pay the flat fee, and wait for the first report.
Get started
Try us free on a demo before you trust us with your evaluation
Open a demo account with any broker you already use and send us the login. We trade it for seven days under a written plan while you watch every trade, and you decide afterwards whether the $220 evaluation is worth it. No card, no deposit, no obligation — the demo is free whether or not you go on to buy.
If you would rather see a real prop firm rulebook first, ask about the trial challenge: a smaller evaluation run through the same process. It suits traders who want a firm-side pass before committing to a full-size account.
To begin either route, send the firm name and the account size you want passed. You will get a confirmation of the fee, an expected timeline, and the first checkpoint within a week.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
How much does ElitePropX charge?
A flat $220 per evaluation, regardless of account size. There is no monthly subscription, no profit split and no percentage of your payouts. The firm's own challenge fee is paid separately and goes to the firm.
Do you take a share of my funded account profits?
No. Once the account is funded and handed over, 100% of the profit is yours. We do not trade the funded account and we do not take a cut of withdrawals.
Which prop firms do you support?
FTMO, FundedNext, The5ers, FXIFY, Alpha Capital Group, FundingPips, Apex Trader Funding, Topstep, MyFundedFutures, Take Profit Trader, TradeDay, MFF and more than twenty firms in total across forex, CFDs and futures. If your firm is not listed, ask — coverage expands as firms launch new evaluation models.
What happens if the evaluation fails?
Managed evaluations include retries. If an attempt breaches a rule, we reset on the same firm and account size at no additional service fee. That is the main reason the fee is flat rather than per attempt.
How long does it take to pass?
The average is around 14 days on a two-phase forex evaluation. Futures evaluations with trailing thresholds can be faster or slower depending on the firm's minimum trading days. A plan and a timeline are agreed before the attempt starts.
Is using a passing service allowed by prop firms?
Rules differ by firm and change over time. Some prohibit third-party trading outright; others restrict account sharing or require the account holder to place trades personally. You are responsible for checking your firm's terms before purchasing. We will tell you what we know about a specific firm's policy when you ask.
Do I need trading experience?
Not to have the evaluation passed. You do need to be able to manage a funded account afterwards, because that part is entirely yours. Traders who have never managed risk before should treat the funded phase as the real learning curve.
What account sizes are available?
From $25,000 up to $300,000, depending on what the firm offers. The service fee does not change with size, so larger accounts are proportionally cheaper to pass through ElitePropX.
Can I use my own trading strategy?
The evaluation is traded on our plan, because the plan is built around the firm's constraints rather than around a market view. After funding, you trade however you like — including your own strategy — with no input from us.
Can I watch you trade before paying?
Yes. Open a free demo account with any broker, send us the login, and we will trade it for seven days while you watch. It costs nothing, needs no card, and carries no obligation. The demo trial page explains exactly what to send and how the week runs.
How do I start?
Message us on Telegram at @voraspas with the firm name and account size. You will receive the fee confirmation, the expected timeline and instructions for the handover. If you are not ready to pay, ask for the free demo week first.
What the $220 actually buys
Price is the first thing most traders ask about and the last thing that should decide the choice, so it is worth being precise about what the flat fee covers. The $220 is a service fee for trading one evaluation on one firm at one account size. It is not the firm's own challenge fee, it does not include a reset charge levied by the firm, and it does not buy a share of a funded account — there is no profit split, because the funded account is issued in your name and paid to you.
| Included in the $220 | Not included |
|---|---|
| Trading the evaluation to target or failure | The firm's challenge or reset fee |
| Rulebook translation and a written risk plan | Additional accounts beyond the one purchased |
| Retries on rule breaches at the same firm and size | Changes to profit split or payout terms |
| A funded login issued in the client's own name | Any share of funded-account profits |
The retry clause is the part worth reading twice. A retry covers an evaluation that ends through a rule breach — a daily loss limit, a maximum loss limit, a consistency check at payout. It does not cover a client deciding to stop mid-evaluation and keep the fee, and it does not transfer to a different firm. That is a deliberate boundary: changing firms changes the rulebook, which means the work starts again and the fee is a new purchase rather than a continuation.
Why a flat fee rather than a profit split
Most services in this market charge a share of the funded account, typically somewhere between 10% and 30% of payouts, sometimes indefinitely. That model aligns incentives in theory — the service earns only if the trader earns — but in practice it changes what the service optimises for. A split model rewards large accounts and long retention; a flat fee rewards a clean pass and a client who comes back for a second account. The second incentive is easier to check: either the certificate exists or it does not.
There is a cost to the flat model, and it should be stated plainly. The service is paid whether or not the evaluation passes, so the only thing protecting quality is the retry clause and reputation. Anyone comparing services should treat that as the key question: what happens on a failure, in writing, before money changes hands.
What happens, step by step
- Send the firm and the size. A short message naming the firm, the account size and the platform is enough to get a quote and a timeline. Nothing else is needed to start.
- Confirm the firm's third-party policy. Some firms prohibit third-party trading and enforce it after funding rather than during the evaluation. Where a firm's position is clear and prohibitive, the honest answer is to pass it yourself or choose another firm.
- Rulebook translation. The firm's terms are reduced to four numbers that fit on an index card: daily loss budget, maximum loss distance, target in R terms and any consistency constraint at payout.
- Evaluation traded to target. Pacing is deliberate rather than fast, typically two to three weeks, because a fast pass with no margin tends to fail the payout stage.
- Funded account issued in your name. The certificate or dashboard screenshot is the record. From that point the account, the payouts and the tax position are yours.
Which firms we will and will not trade
Any firm with a published rulebook and an account size the client can afford is workable in principle. What is not workable is a firm whose terms are ambiguous on the two things that decide an evaluation: how the loss limit is measured and whether third-party trading is permitted. Ambiguity in either direction turns a rules problem into a dispute, and a dispute is the one outcome that costs the client more than a failed attempt.
Firms that explicitly prohibit third-party trading are refused, not worked around. The reason is not moral positioning; it is that enforcement after funding is the worst possible outcome for a client, since it forfeits the account at exactly the point where the work would have paid. A service that quietly accepts those terms is transferring its own risk to the person least able to absorb it.
Everything else is negotiable, and most of it should be discussed before purchase rather than after. Account size, platform, instrument set and even the timing of the attempt can all be adjusted to fit a client's circumstances — a trader who wants a small first account and a three-week window is a different assignment from one who wants the largest tier available this month. What cannot be adjusted is the rulebook, and that is precisely why it is the thing read first.
If you are undecided between two firms, send both names. The reply will usually be a recommendation with a reason attached, and the reason is the useful part: it tells you which of the two rulebooks is more forgiving at the account size you can afford, which is a question with an answer independent of anyone's opinion about the firms themselves.
Your next evaluation does not have to be another retry
One flat $220 for any prop firm, any account size. Retries covered, no profit split, funded login in your name. We work with any firm; before you pay we tell you in writing what its third-party trading clause says and where the enforcement risk sits.