FTMO vs FundedNext vs MyFundedFutures

Side-by-side comparison of two prop firms across evaluation fee, profit target, drawdown type, consistency rule and payout cycle
The cheaper evaluation is not the cheaper challenge if the rules are harder.

FTMO, FundedNext and MyFundedFutures get shortlisted together constantly, and the comparison is usually framed as three firms on one axis. That framing is wrong. Two of them fund forex accounts and one funds futures, and the market decides almost everything that follows — the instruments, the session hours, and above all the mechanic that will eventually end your evaluation if you trade naturally.

Verify on your dashboard

All three firms have changed targets, drawdown models and product lines within the last year, and each now sells multiple account types. The structural differences below are stable; the exact percentages are not. Confirm the numbers on your own dashboard before the first trade.

The first decision is market, not firm

FTMO and FundedNext are forex and CFD firms. MyFundedFutures funds CME futures. That split determines the shape of every rule that matters.

DimensionFTMOFundedNextMyFundedFutures
MarketForex / CFDForex / CFDFutures
Binding constraintDaily loss limitDaily loss limitTrailing drawdown floor
Max loss typeStatic (2-Step) or EOD trailing (1-Step)Static on Stellar modelsTrailing
Structure1-Step and 2-StepStellar 1-Step and 2-StepFutures evaluation
StandoutThe benchmark rulebookStatic drawdown at scaleLow-cost futures access

Read the third row again. It contains the whole comparison. A static drawdown is a fixed line that never moves against you. A trailing drawdown rises with your peak, so a winning trade that reverses shrinks your remaining buffer while your equity curve looks flat. Those two mechanics produce entirely different failure modes.

The forex mechanic: the daily limit

At FTMO and FundedNext the constraint that ends most attempts is the daily loss limit, measured on equity including floating losses. It is a hard stop inside a single session and it does not care about your remaining overall drawdown.

This punishes one specific behaviour: escalating risk within a day. A trader who takes a small morning loss, sizes up to recover at lunch, takes a second loss and doubles into the close will end an FTMO or FundedNext account in a single afternoon. The defence is arithmetic — risk no more than a third of the daily allowance per position so three ordinary consecutive losers still leave you inside the limit.

Static becomes the tiebreaker

Between FTMO and FundedNext, the decisive structural difference is the drawdown type. FTMO's classic 2-Step is static, and FundedNext's Stellar models are static too, so neither gives a trailing floor the chance to move against you. Where a firm offers both a one-step and a two-step product, check which uses which — the trailing model frequently sits in the one-step version.

The futures mechanic: the trailing floor

MyFundedFutures uses a trailing drawdown, which is the standard futures model and the harder concept to master. The floor follows your highest balance upward, keeping a roughly constant gap between the peak and the limit.

The mistake that ends futures accounts

On an account with a $2,500 trailing threshold, run a trade to $1,000 of unrealised profit and the floor rises $1,000 with it. You are still $2,500 from the peak but only $1,500 from your starting balance. Traders who believe they have $3,500 of room — start buffer plus profit — lose the account discovering otherwise.

The relief at futures firms is the lock point: at a defined profit the threshold stops trailing and becomes fixed, converting a moving-target account into an ordinary one. Reaching that level safely is the explicit objective of the early phase, and it matters more than the profit target itself.

Which firm suits which failure mode

Your patternHarder for youSafer for you
Revenge trading within a sessionFTMO / FundedNext (daily limit)MyFundedFutures
Holding winners until they reverseMyFundedFutures (trailing floor)FTMO / FundedNext
Oversizing with full size earlyAll three equallyNone — trade micros
One outsized profitable dayAll three (consistency at payout)None — pace profit

Look at your last two failed evaluations before you buy anything. If both died on a daily breach, the futures firm removes that failure mode. If both died on a trailing floor mid-trade, the static forex models do the same thing in the other direction.

The practical answer

  1. Choose the market you already trade well

    Learning futures session mechanics and a new rulebook at the same time as a new firm is a poor use of a first evaluation.

  2. Then choose the drawdown type

    Static beats trailing for almost everyone who has never passed, because it removes one entire class of failure and needs no special handling.

  3. On futures, trade micros until the floor locks

    That is not a beginner concession; it is the correct instrument on an account whose failure condition moves.

  4. Pace profit for payout eligibility

    All three assess consistency when you withdraw. Spread gains from day one so reaching the target also means being able to cash it out.

  5. Compare retry cost, not the sticker price

    At a typical pass rate you should expect to buy more than one evaluation. That expected-attempt arithmetic, not the headline fee, is the true cost.

Passing it yourself or having it passed

All three are passable unaided by a disciplined trader. The recurring blocker is that each punishes a natural behaviour — escalation for the forex pair, holding winners for the futures firm. If that is your pattern, our challenge passing service handles FTMO, FundedNext and MyFundedFutures evaluations for a flat $220 each, with retries covered on managed accounts and no profit split. If you would rather do it yourself, start with the ultimate guide to passing a prop firm challenge.

Frequently asked questions

The FAQ block below covers which is easiest, why a futures firm sits beside two forex firms, drawdown types and payout reliability. Related: the FTMO vs FundedNext comparison, FTMO vs Apex and the best futures prop firms roundup.

Which of the three is easiest to pass?
Not comparable in the abstract, because two are forex and one is futures. FundedNext's Stellar models use a static drawdown, which removes the moving-floor failure mode entirely and is arguably the most forgiving structure. FTMO's 2-Step is the industry benchmark with a well-documented rulebook, while MyFundedFutures uses a futures trailing floor that punishes holding winners.
Why is MyFundedFutures in the same comparison as two forex firms?
Because traders search for it that way. The three are usually shortlisted together, but the honest answer is that the first choice is market — forex or futures — and only then firm. The market determines the instruments, the session hours and the drawdown mechanic.
Do FTMO and FundedNext use trailing drawdowns?
FTMO's classic 2-Step uses a static maximum loss, while its 1-Step product uses an end-of-day trailing model. FundedNext's Stellar models are static. Note the distinction carefully — the drawdown type often differs between a firm's one-step and two-step products.
Which pays most reliably?
All three have long, documented payout histories, which is why they dominate comparison searches. Weight current payout cadence, minimum qualifying days and independent withdrawal reports above marketing claims.
Can you pass all three for me?
Yes. ElitePropX passes FTMO, FundedNext and MyFundedFutures evaluations for a flat $220 each, with retries covered on managed accounts and no profit split.

Have a question before you commit?

Ask us anything about your firm, your account size or whether a passing service suits you. Two ways to reach us, both answered by a person: Telegram @voraspas, or email support@elitepropx.com. No forms, no queues.

Ready to pass your prop firm challenge?

Flat $220 per evaluation — we trade it for you and hand over a funded account. No hidden cuts, no monthly fees. Send your firm and account size on Telegram or by email and we will confirm availability, the current rules and the timeline.

Chat on Telegram