FTMO vs FundedNext vs MyFundedFutures
FTMO, FundedNext and MyFundedFutures get shortlisted together constantly, and the comparison is usually framed as three firms on one axis. That framing is wrong. Two of them fund forex accounts and one funds futures, and the market decides almost everything that follows — the instruments, the session hours, and above all the mechanic that will eventually end your evaluation if you trade naturally.
Verify on your dashboard
All three firms have changed targets, drawdown models and product lines within the last year, and each now sells multiple account types. The structural differences below are stable; the exact percentages are not. Confirm the numbers on your own dashboard before the first trade.
The first decision is market, not firm
FTMO and FundedNext are forex and CFD firms. MyFundedFutures funds CME futures. That split determines the shape of every rule that matters.
| Dimension | FTMO | FundedNext | MyFundedFutures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market | Forex / CFD | Forex / CFD | Futures |
| Binding constraint | Daily loss limit | Daily loss limit | Trailing drawdown floor |
| Max loss type | Static (2-Step) or EOD trailing (1-Step) | Static on Stellar models | Trailing |
| Structure | 1-Step and 2-Step | Stellar 1-Step and 2-Step | Futures evaluation |
| Standout | The benchmark rulebook | Static drawdown at scale | Low-cost futures access |
Read the third row again. It contains the whole comparison. A static drawdown is a fixed line that never moves against you. A trailing drawdown rises with your peak, so a winning trade that reverses shrinks your remaining buffer while your equity curve looks flat. Those two mechanics produce entirely different failure modes.
The forex mechanic: the daily limit
At FTMO and FundedNext the constraint that ends most attempts is the daily loss limit, measured on equity including floating losses. It is a hard stop inside a single session and it does not care about your remaining overall drawdown.
This punishes one specific behaviour: escalating risk within a day. A trader who takes a small morning loss, sizes up to recover at lunch, takes a second loss and doubles into the close will end an FTMO or FundedNext account in a single afternoon. The defence is arithmetic — risk no more than a third of the daily allowance per position so three ordinary consecutive losers still leave you inside the limit.
Static becomes the tiebreaker
Between FTMO and FundedNext, the decisive structural difference is the drawdown type. FTMO's classic 2-Step is static, and FundedNext's Stellar models are static too, so neither gives a trailing floor the chance to move against you. Where a firm offers both a one-step and a two-step product, check which uses which — the trailing model frequently sits in the one-step version.
The futures mechanic: the trailing floor
MyFundedFutures uses a trailing drawdown, which is the standard futures model and the harder concept to master. The floor follows your highest balance upward, keeping a roughly constant gap between the peak and the limit.
The mistake that ends futures accounts
On an account with a $2,500 trailing threshold, run a trade to $1,000 of unrealised profit and the floor rises $1,000 with it. You are still $2,500 from the peak but only $1,500 from your starting balance. Traders who believe they have $3,500 of room — start buffer plus profit — lose the account discovering otherwise.
The relief at futures firms is the lock point: at a defined profit the threshold stops trailing and becomes fixed, converting a moving-target account into an ordinary one. Reaching that level safely is the explicit objective of the early phase, and it matters more than the profit target itself.
Which firm suits which failure mode
| Your pattern | Harder for you | Safer for you |
|---|---|---|
| Revenge trading within a session | FTMO / FundedNext (daily limit) | MyFundedFutures |
| Holding winners until they reverse | MyFundedFutures (trailing floor) | FTMO / FundedNext |
| Oversizing with full size early | All three equally | None — trade micros |
| One outsized profitable day | All three (consistency at payout) | None — pace profit |
Look at your last two failed evaluations before you buy anything. If both died on a daily breach, the futures firm removes that failure mode. If both died on a trailing floor mid-trade, the static forex models do the same thing in the other direction.
The practical answer
Choose the market you already trade well
Learning futures session mechanics and a new rulebook at the same time as a new firm is a poor use of a first evaluation.
Then choose the drawdown type
Static beats trailing for almost everyone who has never passed, because it removes one entire class of failure and needs no special handling.
On futures, trade micros until the floor locks
That is not a beginner concession; it is the correct instrument on an account whose failure condition moves.
Pace profit for payout eligibility
All three assess consistency when you withdraw. Spread gains from day one so reaching the target also means being able to cash it out.
Compare retry cost, not the sticker price
At a typical pass rate you should expect to buy more than one evaluation. That expected-attempt arithmetic, not the headline fee, is the true cost.
Passing it yourself or having it passed
All three are passable unaided by a disciplined trader. The recurring blocker is that each punishes a natural behaviour — escalation for the forex pair, holding winners for the futures firm. If that is your pattern, our challenge passing service handles FTMO, FundedNext and MyFundedFutures evaluations for a flat $220 each, with retries covered on managed accounts and no profit split. If you would rather do it yourself, start with the ultimate guide to passing a prop firm challenge.
Frequently asked questions
The FAQ block below covers which is easiest, why a futures firm sits beside two forex firms, drawdown types and payout reliability. Related: the FTMO vs FundedNext comparison, FTMO vs Apex and the best futures prop firms roundup.
Which of the three is easiest to pass?
Why is MyFundedFutures in the same comparison as two forex firms?
Do FTMO and FundedNext use trailing drawdowns?
Which pays most reliably?
Can you pass all three for me?
Have a question before you commit?
Ask us anything about your firm, your account size or whether a passing service suits you. Two ways to reach us, both answered by a person: Telegram @voraspas, or email support@elitepropx.com. No forms, no queues.
Ready to pass your prop firm challenge?
Flat $220 per evaluation — we trade it for you and hand over a funded account. No hidden cuts, no monthly fees. Send your firm and account size on Telegram or by email and we will confirm availability, the current rules and the timeline.