FTMO vs FTUK: UK-Based vs Global - Which Prop Firm Wins?

Last updated: August 8, 2026 | 16 min read

UK traders face a genuine dilemma in 2026: stick with FTMO, the global standard that has paid traders for a decade, or back FTUK, the homegrown challenger built around UK traders. I compared both firms line by line - every fee, rule, and payout detail - so you can see exactly what each one costs you in time and money.

Here is the short version before the deep dive: both firms run the same two-phase evaluation with the same 5% daily loss and 10% static drawdown, and both start you at an 80% profit split. The real differences are time limits (30 days per phase versus 60), minimum trading days (4 versus 10), weekend holding (no versus yes), and price. Which one wins depends almost entirely on how you trade.

The Big Picture

FTMO has been the benchmark of the prop firm industry since 2015. It runs a strict two-phase evaluation, holds traders to a 5% daily loss limit, and has paid out hundreds of millions to funded traders worldwide. In 2025 it rebranded to FTMO Global as part of a legal entity restructure - the product you know is unchanged, but the paperwork behind it is cleaner than ever. Account sizes run up to $400K, platforms include MT4, MT5 and cTrader, and payouts land about 14 days after you request them.

FTUK is the UK's answer to that dominance. Founded in 2017, it offers a nearly identical two-phase structure with one meaningful twist: double the evaluation time. Where FTMO gives you 30 days per phase, FTUK gives you 60. For traders with jobs, families, or simply slower strategies, that extra runway changes everything. FTUK also allows weekend holding, which FTMO's standard accounts do not.

Both firms target the same 10% + 5% profit goals, both cap daily loss at 5%, and both use a 10% static maximum drawdown. The differences hide in the details - time limits, minimum trading days, weekend holding, and price.

Fees Compared

FTMO's pricing is well known: $350 for a $50K evaluation, $540 for $100K, and $1,080 for $200K. FTUK undercuts it at almost every level - around $86 for $10K, $285 for $50K, and $475 for $100K. If you are buying a six-figure account, FTUK saves you roughly $65 outright, and the gap only widens when you factor in retakes.

FTMO refunds the challenge fee with your first payout — so its fee is effectively a deposit for traders who reach funded status. FTUK does not refund, so treat its fee as the cost of the evaluation itself. The real value comparison is what you get back after funding: FTMO's on-demand payout system (free for your first two profit splits, then a 5% fee) is a genuinely useful feature that FTUK's monthly cycle does not match. If cash flow control matters to you, that alone can be worth the price difference.

Rules Compared

The core risk framework is identical: 5% daily loss, 10% static max drawdown, and a 10% then 5% profit target across two phases. The divergence starts with time. FTUK's 60-day phases are among the most trader-friendly in the industry at this price - you can take an entire month off and still finish Phase 1 comfortably, and weekend holding means a Friday swing position is never a problem.

FTMO counters with fewer minimum trading days (4 versus FTUK's 10) and the option to extend any phase for a fee. If you can only trade weekends, FTMO's lower day count is easier to hit; if you need calendar time rather than session count, FTUK wins. A quick summary of the rule differences:

Payouts Compared

Both firms start funded traders at an 80% profit split. FTMO raises yours to 90% after consistent profitable months, while FTUK ties its 90% tier to consistency-based milestones. Payout-wise, FTMO processes requests about 14 days after submission and adds on-demand withdrawals once you have banked two free profit splits - after that, each on-demand split costs 5%.

FTUK pays monthly. It is dependable, but slower - you budget around your statement date rather than requesting whenever profits accumulate. For traders who want cash flow control, FTMO's model is objectively better. For traders who just want a reliable payment each month and value local GBP support, FTUK is perfectly fine.

Weekend Holding: A Quiet Dealbreaker

Most comparison charts skip this, but it decides the pick for swing traders. FTMO's standard accounts close your positions at the weekly close; if your edge is built on holding GBPUSD or EURUSD swings into Monday's gap, you literally cannot run that strategy at FTMO. FTUK allows weekend holding, so your Friday entries survive the weekend intact.

This is not a small detail. A meaningful share of profitable swing setups occur exactly at the Friday close, and being forced to flatten hands away your edge. If you trade higher timeframes, put FTUK at the top of your shortlist for this rule alone.

Which Is Better for UK Traders?

Being UK-based matters more than most comparison charts admit. FTUK gives you local support in your time zone, GBP-friendly service, and a firm that understands UK bank holidays and payment rails. If anything goes wrong, your dispute is with a company you can physically reach. For UK-based swing traders who value time and weekend holding, FTUK is the natural pick.

That said, FTMO's global scale means deeper liquidity, more instrument choice (cTrader included), and a track record that survives any single market regime. The honest recommendation: UK swing traders lean FTUK; UK traders chasing maximum account size, multi-market access, and payout flexibility lean FTMO.

Background: The Global Benchmark vs The UK Homegrown

FTMO (2015 – Present)

FTMO built the modern prop firm industry from Prague in 2015 and has paid out over half a billion dollars since. Its two-phase template — 10% then 5% targets, 5% daily loss, 10% static drawdown — is the most copied rulebook in trading. After restructuring into FTMO Global during the 2023-2024 shakeout, it never missed a payout and continues to scale accounts to $400K across MT4, MT5, and cTrader.

FTUK (2017 – Present)

FTUK is the UK's homegrown challenger: a UK-incorporated firm operating since 2017 with local support, GBP-friendly service, and a compliance-first approach. Its structure mirrors FTMO's two-phase model but doubles the evaluation window to 60 days per phase and explicitly allows weekend holding — two features that matter enormously to part-time and swing traders. It undercuts FTMO on price at most tiers.

The Time-Runway Math: 30 Days vs 60 Days

Rule ($100K)FTMOFTUK
Profit targets10% + 5%10% + 5%
Time per phase30 days (extendable for a fee)60 days
Minimum trading days4 per phase10 per phase
Daily loss5%5%
Max drawdown10% (static)10% (static)
Weekend holdingNo (standard accounts)Yes

The trade-off is clear: FTUK doubles your calendar time but demands 2.5x the trading sessions. A trader with a full-time job and one hour per evening can comfortably hit 10 sessions in 60 days; hitting 4 sessions in 30 days is also easy — the real question is whether you need the calendar buffer to wait for setups. FTUK's 60-day window plus weekend holding means a swing trader can take a two-week break mid-phase and still pass. FTMO's 30-day window forces tempo, which suits disciplined short-session traders.

Cost of Entry: Where Each Dollar Goes

Account SizeFTMOFTUK
$10,000$89~$86
$50,000$350~$285
$100,000$540~$475

FTUK is cheaper at every tier, and the savings compound with retries. But remember the refund difference: FTMO returns its fee with your first payout, FTUK does not. For a trader who passes on attempt one, FTMO's $540 is returned in full — making its effective cost

Who Should Pick Which?

versus FTUK's $475 kept. For a trader who needs three attempts, FTUK's cheaper per-attempt price wins. Run the math on your own pass probability before choosing.

Real Trader Experiences (2026)

Case Study 1: The UK Swing Trader

Client is a London-based swing trader whose edge is built on Friday-close entries: "FTMO was never viable — I had to flatten every Friday and re-enter Monday, which destroyed my average entry. FTUK lets me hold over the weekend, and the 60-day phase means I can wait for the perfect setup. Passed Phase 1 with room to spare."

Case Study 2: The Weekend-Only Trader

Client can only trade Saturdays and Sundays: "FTMO's 4 minimum days are easy on paper, but the 30-day clock still burned me twice — I'd run out of calendar before finding setups. FTUK's 10 sessions over 60 days fit my life perfectly. I took five weeks to pass Phase 1 and never felt rushed."

Case Study 3: The Payout-Flexibility Trader

Client scaled from FTUK to FTMO after his first year: "FTUK got me funded — great firm, great support. But once I was consistent, FTMO's on-demand withdrawals and 90% consistency tier were worth more to me than the time buffer. I outgrew FTUK's monthly cycle."

Who Should Choose FTUK

Who Should Choose FTMO

Frequently Asked Questions (Expanded)

Q: Does FTUK cover crypto?
A: FTUK focuses on forex and indices; FTMO adds crypto and broader multi-market coverage. Crypto traders should choose FTMO.

Q: Can I get a refund at FTUK if I pass?
A: FTUK does not refund the challenge fee. FTMO refunds its fee with your first payout — a meaningful difference in effective cost.

Q: Which firm handles UK bank transfers better?
A: FTUK is UK-incorporated with GBP-friendly rails, making local transfers simpler. FTMO pays globally via bank/wire and crypto options.

Q: Is FCA regulation involved at FTUK?
A: Prop trading itself sits outside FCA regulation, but FTUK's UK incorporation gives you local legal recourse — an advantage over offshore rivals.

Who Should Pick Which?

Pick FTUK if: you are UK-based, you swing trade, you want 60-day phases, or you need weekend holding to run your strategy.

Pick FTMO if: you want $400K account sizes, cTrader, on-demand payouts, 90% splits, or the industry's strongest reputation.

The Final Verdict

FTUK is the better fit for UK traders who need time and flexibility - 60-day phases and weekend holding are real advantages, and it is cheaper at the tiers that matter. FTMO remains the better value for anyone who wants larger accounts, faster payout cycles, and a decade of proven reliability. If you are in the UK and new to this, start with FTUK's longer runway; if you are scaling up, FTMO's ceiling is higher.

Need Help Passing FTMO or FTUK?

I've passed 500+ prop firm challenges with a 95% success rate. $220 flat for any account size, at either firm. Free test challenge available first so you can verify my results before you commit.

Message me on Telegram to start: @Voraspas

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is FTUK regulated?
A: FTUK is a UK-incorporated prop firm operating since 2017. Prop trading itself sits outside FCA regulation, but a UK base means local legal recourse, GBP-friendly service, and compliance-first operations that many offshore rivals lack.

Q: Which is cheaper: FTMO or FTUK?
A: At $100K, FTUK is cheaper at roughly $475 versus FTMO's $540. At $50K the gap is about $65, so check the exact tier you plan to buy.

Q: Does FTUK allow weekend holding?
A: Yes - FTUK explicitly allows positions held over the weekend. FTMO's standard accounts generally don't, so this is a real differentiator for swing traders.

Q: Which firm pays out faster?
A: FTMO processes payouts roughly 14 days after request and offers on-demand withdrawals after two free splits. FTUK pays monthly, which is reliable but slower.

Q: Which is easier to pass?
A: FTUK's 60-day phases and weekend holding give a bigger time safety margin; FTMO's 4 minimum days suit traders who prefer fewer sessions. It depends on your schedule.

Q: Which should a beginner choose?
A: Beginners who want a safety margin should take FTUK's 60-day phases. Beginners who want the largest accounts, most markets, and the longest track record should take FTMO.

Related Guides

← Compare all 50+ prop firms

Prefer we handle it for you?

Skip the stress — our team passes your challenge for you. $220 flat, 95% success rate, verified results, free test first.