TopStep vs Tradify: Which Futures Prop Firm Has Better Payout Terms?
Last updated: August 2026 | 12 min read
TopStep is the elder statesman of futures prop trading — the firm that made the "combine" a household word for retail futures traders. Tradify is the challenger: a newer, cheaper, faster-paying entrant that's trying to steal TopStep's customers with aggressive pricing and weekly payouts. Which one should you fund your trading with? I compared their rules, costs, profit splits, payout speeds, and the less obvious details that only show up after you've traded them for a while.
Why These Two Firms Are Often Compared
Both firms sit in the same corner of the prop industry: futures prop trading, where traders trade ES, NQ, RTY, and other CME contracts on simulated accounts and earn real payouts on real profits. Unlike forex prop firms (FTMO, FundedNext) that charge a percentage-based evaluation, futures firms like TopStep and Tradify sell monthly subscriptions with no time limit — you keep trading until you hit the target or blow the account.
The comparison is natural because they target the same customer: the index-futures day trader who wants a bigger account than their personal capital allows. TopStep has the brand and the track record. Tradify has the price and the payout speed. The right answer depends entirely on what you value — and that's what this review breaks down.
Company Backgrounds: Experience vs Momentum
TopStep: The Established Giant
Founded in 2012 in Chicago, TopStep has been running futures combines for well over a decade. It has paid out more than $150 million to traders over its lifetime, has one of the largest trader communities in the industry (the TopStepTV live-streaming platform), and has survived multiple regulatory shifts and industry crises that killed younger firms. When futures prop firms were being scrutinized in 2024, TopStep's compliance-first approach kept it operating without interruption.
That track record matters for one reason above all: they've paid through every market condition. Bull markets, bear markets, flash crashes, platform outages — TopStep's payout machinery has kept running. For a trader choosing where to build a long-term funded career, that's the most valuable asset a firm can have.
Tradify: The Aggressive Challenger
Tradify is a newer entrant that launched with a simple pitch: lower entry fees than TopStep, weekly payouts instead of bi-weekly or monthly, and a one-phase evaluation that skips the second hurdle. It's part of the wave of "modern" futures prop firms that learned from TopStep's model and stripped it down to the essentials.
The trade-off: Tradify hasn't been tested by a crisis. It doesn't have a decade of payout history. Its rules are generous — but the industry is littered with firms that started generous and then tightened terms when the bills came due. That's not an accusation; it's a risk factor you should price in.
Comparison Table: TopStepTrader vs Tradify
| Feature | TopStepTrader | Tradify |
|---|---|---|
| Market | Futures (ES, NQ, RTY) | Futures |
| Profit Split | 80% → 90% | 80% |
| Max Account | $300K | $200K |
| Evaluation | 2-phase or 1-phase | 1-phase |
| Daily Loss | $1,000 on $50K | $1,000 on $50K |
| Max Drawdown | $2,000 (static) | $2,500 (trailing) |
| Time Limit | None | None |
| Min Trading Days | None | 5 |
| Cost ($50K) | $165 | $130 |
| Payout | 14 days | Weekly |
Evaluation Structure: Two-Phase vs One-Phase
This is the biggest structural difference between the two firms, and it changes the difficulty profile completely.
TopStep's Options
TopStep offers both a traditional 2-Step Combine (Step 1: $3,000 profit target on $50K, then Step 2: $2,000 target) and a newer 1-Step Express (a single $4,000 target with a $2,000 trailing drawdown). The 2-Step is the classic route: it's slower but each phase is individually achievable, and the trailing drawdown resets between steps. The Express is faster but tighter — one mistake and you're done.
Tradify's Single Step
Tradify runs only a 1-phase evaluation: hit the profit target once, and you're funded. On paper, fewer phases should mean an easier path. In practice, single-phase evaluations usually compensate with a tighter drawdown or a higher target — and Tradify's trailing drawdown structure means your allowed loss shrinks as you profit. TopStep's static $2,000 on the 2-Step gives you a fixed buffer you can always see; a trailing drawdown moves the goalposts as you climb.
The practical takeaway: If you're a steady, methodical trader, the 2-Step's fixed buffer is friendlier. If you're aggressive and fast, the 1-phase at either firm suits your style — but only if you can handle a drawdown that tightens as you profit.
Static vs Trailing Drawdown: What Actually Changes
The table shows "$2,000 static" for TopStep and "$2,500 trailing" for Tradify — but these behave very differently in practice, and this is where most traders misunderstand the risk.
- Static drawdown (TopStep): Your stop-loss is measured from your starting balance. On a $50K account, you can lose $2,000 from $50,000 — down to $48,000 — at any point, regardless of how much you've made. If you're up $5,000 at $55,000, you can still only lose down to $48,000. Your buffer grows as you profit (you have $7,000 of room at that point), which is forgiving.
- Trailing drawdown (Tradify): Your stop-loss is measured from your highest balance. If you reach $54,000, your floor moves up to $51,500. Every new equity high tightens the leash. A trader who grinds to $54,000 and then has one bad day at $52,000 has used $2,000 of a $2,500 buffer — one more bad trade and the account is gone, even though they were never "down" relative to the start.
Trailing drawdowns punish giveback. They're the reason many traders find Tradify-style accounts harder to keep than they are to pass. TopStep's static model is objectively more forgiving for swing traders and anyone who takes a breather after a good run.
Profit Split Math: 80% vs 80% → 90%
Both start at 80%, but TopStep escalates. Let's put real numbers on it:
| Monthly Profit | TopStep (80%) | Tradify (80%) |
|---|---|---|
| $2,000 | $1,600 | $1,600 |
| $5,000 | $4,000 | $4,000 |
| $10,000 | $8,000 (90% at scale: $9,000) | $8,000 |
TopStep's split escalates to 90% as you accumulate profitable funded months and scale your account — a real loyalty reward for traders who stick around. Tradify stays flat at 80%. If you're in this for the long haul and expect to be consistently profitable, TopStep's 90% ceiling puts more money in your pocket over a year. If you just want the simplest math, 80% flat is easier to plan around.
Payout Speed: Weekly vs 14 Days
This is Tradify's headline advantage, and it's genuine. Weekly payouts mean your profit cycle is 7 days instead of 14. For a full-time trader who lives on trading income, that's a meaningful cash-flow difference — you can cover expenses, compound faster, and feel the reward loop more immediately.
TopStep's 14-day cycle is still faster than the monthly cycles of many forex prop firms, but it's not weekly. The counterpoint: TopStep's payout process is battle-tested, with automated systems that rarely glitch and a support team that has handled millions of payouts. A fast payout system that occasionally stalls is worse than a slightly slower one that never does — and Tradify's payout machinery hasn't yet been stress-tested at scale.
Cost Comparison: Subscriptions and Total Cost of Entry
Tradify wins on sticker price: $130 vs $165 for the $50K evaluation. But the real cost question is total cost until funded, and that depends on how many attempts you need:
| Scenario | TopStep ($165/mo) | Tradify ($130/mo) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month (pass) | $165 | $130 |
| 2 months | $330 | $260 |
| 3 months | $495 | $390 |
| With ElitePropX ($220 flat + 1 month fee) | $385 | $350 |
Note that both firms charge monthly subscription fees — the combine is a subscription, not a one-time purchase. If you don't pass in month one, you pay again in month two. That's standard for futures firms and very different from forex firms' one-time challenge fees. The practical implication: futures evaluations favor traders who pass fast, which is exactly where a professional execution service earns its keep.
Platforms, Instruments, and Trading Experience
TopStep offers the industry-standard futures toolkit: NinjaTrader, TradingView, Tradovate, Rithmic, and Sierra Chart — essentially every serious futures platform. You trade the CME micro and mini contracts: ES, NQ, RTY, YM, plus metals, energies, and treasuries. TopStep also has a market-replay feature in NinjaTrader that's genuinely useful for practice.
Tradify's platform support is more limited — typically NinjaTrader and TradingView — and its instrument list is smaller. If you trade a specific product or need a specific platform, verify it's supported before you subscribe. Platform support is one of those details that feels trivial until you discover your favorite setup isn't available.
Minimum Trading Days and Other Rule Details
Tradify requires 5 minimum trading days before you can pass, even if you hit the target on day one. TopStep has no minimum trading days on its combines — you can theoretically hit the target and pass quickly (subject to their "consistency" style checks on large single-day profits).
Other rule differences worth noting:
- News trading: Both firms restrict or flag high-impact news trading; check each rulebook for the exact window.
- Weekend holding: Futures markets are mostly closed on weekends, but both firms prohibit holding positions through the Friday close without authorization.
- Copy trading: Both prohibit copy trading between accounts — a real constraint for multi-account traders.
- Account activation: TopStep has a well-documented funded-account activation flow; Tradify's is newer and occasionally has support delays reported in communities.
Which Trader Should Choose Which Firm?
Choose TopStep if:
- You want a decade of verifiable payout history behind your money
- You prefer a static drawdown that doesn't tighten as you profit
- You plan to build a long-term funded career and want the 90% split ceiling
- You trade on a specific platform (Sierra Chart, Rithmic) that only TopStep supports
- You want the largest account size available ($300K vs $200K)
Choose Tradify if:
- You want the lowest entry cost ($130 vs $165)
- Weekly payouts matter for your cash flow
- You prefer a single-phase evaluation without a second hurdle
- You're comfortable with a newer firm that hasn't faced a crisis yet
- You trade only ES/NQ on NinjaTrader or TradingView
A Worked Month: Same Trader, Both Firms
Let's simulate one month for the same trader on both platforms. Trader profile: $50K evaluation, trades ES and NQ, targets 0.5% per day, makes $3,000 gross profit in the month with one drawdown stretch of $1,800 at the worst point.
| Event | TopStep ($50K) | Tradify ($50K) |
|---|---|---|
| Entry cost | $165 | $130 |
| Worst drawdown | $1,800 — inside $2,000 static cap | $1,800 — inside $2,500 trailing cap (but if equity peaked at $52,400, the floor is $49,900, leaving only $900 of room at the low point) |
| Result | Passes 2-Step Step 1, moves to Step 2 | Passes 1-phase, funded immediately |
| Payout on $3,000 | After Step 2 — $2,400 at 80% | Weekly — $2,400 at 80%, received in installments as earned |
The same trader, the same month, the same profit — and the experience diverges on two points: Tradify gets you funded and paying faster, while TopStep's static cap gives you noticeably more breathing room during the losing stretch. Notice how the trailing drawdown in the Tradify column shrinks the effective buffer: at the low point, the real room was only $900, not the $2,500 the marketing materials advertise. That's the hidden tax of trailing drawdowns, and it's why you must track your own equity peaks.
The Trailing Drawdown Trap: A Cautionary Tale
Here's the scenario that ends Tradify accounts that TopStep accounts survive. A trader grinds a $50K account to $54,500 over three weeks — great run, +9%. The trailing floor has moved up to $52,000. The trader then has a normal bad week: three losing days totaling $2,300. On TopStep, that's an annoyance — the account is at $52,200, still $4,200 above the static $48,000 floor. On Tradify, the account is at $52,200 — just $200 above the $52,000 trailing floor. One more modest losing trade ends the evaluation.
The profit is identical. The risk taken is identical. The outcome is completely different — because Tradify's floor chased the equity higher. This single mechanic explains more blown Tradify-style accounts than any strategy failure. If you choose Tradify, you must treat every equity high as a new, tighter danger zone, and you should consider banking profits into reduced size rather than letting the position run.
Risk Factors Specific to Newer Firms
Choosing Tradify means accepting risks that don't exist with TopStep. They're not deal-breakers, but they deserve an honest airing:
- No crisis track record: TopStep has paid through a decade of conditions. Tradify's payout system has only been tested in a bull market for prop firms. The firms that failed in 2024 all looked fine before the stress hit.
- Terms can change: Newer firms adjust rules more aggressively as they learn their cost structure. A firm that starts with $2,500 trailing drawdown may tighten it after a wave of payouts. Established firms move slowly; challengers iterate fast.
- Support maturity: Community reports on newer firms skew toward slower support responses and occasional platform issues. TopStep's support has had a decade to refine.
- Community size: TopStep's community (TopStepTV, forums, thousands of funded traders) is itself an asset — education, accountability, and market insight you don't get from a younger firm's smaller community.
None of this makes Tradify a bad choice — it makes it a different risk profile. Price your decision accordingly.
How to Pass Either Evaluation (Strategy Notes)
- Size off the daily loss, not the account. A $1,000 daily cap on $50K means a 2% daily limit. Risk $100-200 per trade (0.2-0.4%) and you can survive 5-10 losing trades in a day. The daily cap is the real constraint in futures combines — the profit target is just a matter of time.
- Never hold through news. Both firms flag high-impact news trading. ES and NQ can move $500-1,000 in seconds on CPI or FOMC — one news spike can consume your entire daily cap. Close everything before the release.
- On Tradify, bank profits by reducing size. After a big winning day, drop position size for the next session. The trailing floor has moved up; the risk-reward of a normal-size position is now worse relative to your remaining buffer.
- On TopStep 2-Step, treat Step 2 differently. Step 2's target is smaller, so the temptation is to rush. Don't — Step 2 has the same daily cap, and a breach there wipes the whole combine. Trade Step 2 at half your Step 1 size.
- Use market replay for rule practice. TopStep's NinjaTrader market replay is excellent for practicing the exact discipline (session hours, sizing, news avoidance) before risking a subscription.
The Final Verdict
If you're optimizing purely for speed and price, Tradify is the better deal today: cheaper entry, weekly payouts, one phase. But if you're building a career — and especially if you want a drawdown that stays put, a 90% split ceiling, and a firm that's paid through every market condition for over a decade — TopStep is the safer long-term home. My honest recommendation for most traders: start with TopStep's 2-Step for the static drawdown, and consider Tradify only if weekly cash flow is a genuine need. Whichever you choose, pass it with the free test first.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you trade part-time on either firm?
Yes — neither firm requires a minimum number of hours per day, and TopStep's no-minimum-trading-days combine is ideal for weekend and evening traders. Tradify's 5-day minimum is easy to hit part-time. The no-time-limit structure of both firms is their biggest advantage over forex-style 30-day challenges.
What happens to my payout if I scale up?
TopStep's scaling program increases your account size as you complete profitable funded months, and the split escalates toward 90%. Tradify's scaling is newer and smaller. If growth matters, TopStep has the more mature path.
Are the accounts simulated?
Yes — both firms run evaluations on simulated capital, exactly like the rest of the prop industry. You trade with real market data and real risk parameters; the firm pays you real money on the profits. This is the standard, legitimate futures prop model.
Which firm is harder to pass?
For most traders, TopStep's 2-Step is more forgiving because the static drawdown gives a fixed buffer, while Tradify's trailing drawdown tightens as you profit. But TopStep's two phases mean more total work. "Harder" depends on whether you struggle more with drawdown discipline or with sustained effort.
Can a passing service handle either firm?
Yes — futures combines are actually the fastest challenges to pass professionally because there's no time limit and no minimum-days grind on TopStep. ElitePropX passes both TopStep and Tradify at the flat $220 rate, with a free test first. Message @Voraspas on Telegram to verify before you pay anything.
Need Help Passing TopStepTrader or Tradify?
I've passed 500+ prop firm challenges with a 95% success rate. $220 flat for any account size. Free test challenge available first so you can verify my results.
Message me on Telegram to start: @Voraspas
Prefer we handle it for you?
Skip the stress — our team passes your challenge for you. $220 flat, 95% success rate, verified results, free test first.