FTMO vs Audacity Capital: Standard Prop Firm vs Profit Split Model
Last updated: July 2026 | 6 min read
Audacity Capital doesn't charge challenge fees — they take a lower split instead. Is this model better than FTMO's traditional approach?
Comparison Table: FTMO vs Audacity Capital
| Feature | FTMO | Audacity Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Challenge fee + high split | No fee, lower split |
| Profit Split | 80% → 90% | 50% (no fee model) |
| Max Account | $400K | $200K |
| Challenge Fee | $500+ | $0 |
| Daily Loss | 5% | No fixed rule |
| Max Drawdown | 10% (static) | Managed by firm |
| Time Limit | 30 days per phase | Negotiable |
| Min Trading Days | 4 | None |
| Instruments | Forex, indices, crypto | Forex only |
| Payout | Monthly | Monthly |
Winner for No-Risk Evaluation: Audacity Capital
Zero upfront cost means you can't lose money trying. If you're confident in your edge, the no-fee model saves you thousands compared to traditional challenges.
Winner for Control and Scale: FTMO
80-90% profit split means you keep most of what you make. With $400K max accounts and full trading freedom, FTMO puts you in the driver's seat.
The Final Verdict
Choose Audacity Capital if you want zero upfront risk and are okay with 50% splits. Choose FTMO if you want maximum profit retention and trading freedom.
Need Help Passing FTMO or Audacity Capital?
I've passed 500+ prop firm challenges with a 95% success rate. $220 flat for any account size. Free test challenge available first so you can verify my results.
Message me on Telegram to start: @Voraspas